Project

General

Profile

Actions

Demande #663

closed

Texte slide 18

Added by Gérald Sédrati-Dinet almost 13 years ago. Updated almost 13 years ago.

Status:
Résolu
Priority:
Normale
Category:
Conception
Start date:
08/08/2011
Due date:
08/14/2011
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Spent time:

Actions #1

Updated by Gérald Sédrati-Dinet almost 13 years ago

  • Due date set to 08/14/2011
  • Status changed from Nouveau to Résolu
  • Assignee set to Gérald Sédrati-Dinet
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

Also, a unified and specialized patent jurisdiction suffers from the example of the United States, where the Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has showned to behave in an excessively pro-patent direction, broadening the scope of patentable subject matter and endowing patentees with unwarranted power. This ever-growing desire of the CAFC to expand its powers has started to be criticized, not only by economic and legal scholars, but also by the US Supreme Court.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF